Comments on: I Shot Wolfen NC500, a New Color Film from ORWO https://casualphotophile.com/2023/05/17/wolfen-nc500-color-film-review/ Cameras and Photography Sun, 10 Sep 2023 04:29:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Khürt L Williams https://casualphotophile.com/2023/05/17/wolfen-nc500-color-film-review/#comment-22583 Sun, 10 Sep 2023 04:29:00 +0000 https://casualphotophile.com/?p=30772#comment-22583 I hated the result. It’s overhyped and overpriced.

]]>
By: Rowan Hazel https://casualphotophile.com/2023/05/17/wolfen-nc500-color-film-review/#comment-22516 Fri, 11 Aug 2023 23:54:07 +0000 https://casualphotophile.com/?p=30772#comment-22516 I used some ORWO slide film during the 90s. I think it was ISO 100 & was very cheap. It was grainy & contrasty & had a cool palette that was different to any other film. Skin tones were awful compared to those of the big manufacturers.

It wasn’t for everyone or all occasions but, as a change, I loved it.

]]>
By: Mark https://casualphotophile.com/2023/05/17/wolfen-nc500-color-film-review/#comment-22333 Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:20:14 +0000 https://casualphotophile.com/?p=30772#comment-22333 Looks like long expired material. No way it’s worth the price they want for it.

]]>
By: withtragediesadorned https://casualphotophile.com/2023/05/17/wolfen-nc500-color-film-review/#comment-22290 Sun, 28 May 2023 16:59:24 +0000 https://casualphotophile.com/?p=30772#comment-22290 Poor results for brand new film stock. I’d expect such results from badly expired film that has been stored in warm environment, but not from fresh new roll. Thanks, but no, thanks.

]]>
By: Maciej https://casualphotophile.com/2023/05/17/wolfen-nc500-color-film-review/#comment-22271 Wed, 24 May 2023 10:33:14 +0000 https://casualphotophile.com/?p=30772#comment-22271 In reply to Thomas.

Sorry, i linked a private account 😀
here: https://www.instagram.com/mac_miller_photo/

]]>
By: Maciej https://casualphotophile.com/2023/05/17/wolfen-nc500-color-film-review/#comment-22270 Wed, 24 May 2023 10:32:05 +0000 https://casualphotophile.com/?p=30772#comment-22270 In reply to Thomas.

I’m not sure about that. I tried ISO 320, and it seamed the same. It’s more about the dynamic range of the film and how it handles light i think.. My first thought as to shoot it at ISO 250, bit i tried ISO 400 instead and got better results..
You can check some f the shots in my recent posts
https://www.instagram.com/maciekmiller/

]]>