Polaroid Releases the I-2, Their Most Advanced Instant Camera in Decades

Polaroid Releases the I-2, Their Most Advanced Instant Camera in Decades

1989 864 James Tocchio

Polaroid has just announced and released the Polaroid I-2, an instant camera with a full suite of user controls, a new lens, an informative viewfinder, and a significant price tag. With the I-2, Polaroid is targeting instant film shooters who want more control and better quality than that typically provided by simpler instant cameras.

I haven’t gotten my hands on a Polaroid I-2 quite yet. When I have, I’ll write up a comprehensive review. Until then, here’s the pertinent details of Polaroid’s newest camera, and some educated thoughts on the same.

The key features which make the Polaroid I-2 unique in the brand’s lineup are these :

The camera is an entirely new machine, developed in-house at Polaroid. It offers the full suite of user controls, including shutter, aperture, automatic, and full manual control. In addition, it has controls for exposure compensation, auto-focus (using Lidar), a built-in flash, and a fully informative viewfinder with pretty, orange LEDs, a new lens, and a price of $599.

First Impression

The new Polaroid I-2 looks amazing! It’s beautiful. I’m excited to use it and see if the promise of user controls, a nice lens, accurate auto-focus, and that lovely viewfinder add up to what should be (logically) the best Polaroid shooting experience available today.

I’ve reviewed almost every Polaroid camera that’s been released in the last fifty years, including the new, post-rebirth Polaroid cameras. I’ve enjoyed many of them and been frustrated by many others. Typically my frustrations stem from a lack of user controls, the unpredictability of the resulting images, and the cost of shooting Polaroid film when so many of the shots are wasted and useless (often a result of bad film). I’ve written whole articles about these frustrations.

With Polaroid’s new I-2, it seems that some of these frustrations may be assuaged. The added user controls will help. The fact that the camera is new (and not a crusty, old relic from 1980) will help. And that new lens will help.

But there’s a big red flag in Polaroid’s marketing material for their newest, fanciest camera. They’re still leaning into the imperfection angle. They write that the camera is “Made for the Imperfectionists.” That’s code for “Our film is still not great, and no matter what you try and no matter how much money you spend on a new camera, you’ll never make a perfect Polaroid image.”

Okay, fine. I’m not looking for perfection. I’ve written about that, too. I love imperfect photos. The problem, for me, is that Polaroid’s film isn’t just imperfect, it’s often simply poor.

Writing critical takes like these risks alienating the company’s communications team. I don’t want to do that. But I have to tell the truth. And the truth is that I want Polaroid to succeed. I want to love their cameras and film. I want to shoot it weekly, and share those positive experiences with my readers. But the sad reality is that every time I buy an eight pack of Polaroid film for $19, one or two of the photos come out undeveloped, or streaked. Two or three more have weird unforeseen color shifts, or they’re criminally soft, or they’re under-exposed.

It’s possible that this new camera will fix all of that.

But it’s an expensive camera, and I’m not convinced that it can deliver an instant photography experience that’s better than that of Fujifilm’s best Instax machine (besides larger images).

But that’s not the point of this article. We’ll save the full review and comparisons for when I test it. When that happens, you can read all about it here.

Order your Polaroid I-2 from B&H Photo here

Buy a retro instant camera from our shop at F Stop Cameras


Follow Casual Photophile on Youtube, TwitterFacebook and Instagram

[Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H Photo, Amazon, and eBay. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. Many thanks for your support.]

James Tocchio

James Tocchio is a writer and photographer, and the founder of Casual Photophile. He’s spent years researching, collecting, and shooting classic and collectible cameras. In addition to his work here, he’s also the founder of the online camera shop Fstopcameras.com.

All stories by:James Tocchio
8 comments
  • Damiano Marchesini September 7, 2023 at 10:38 am

    Lens is plastic, not glass unfortunately

  • I agree with your initial analysis and await your review. While tempting I doubt I will pull the trigger on this camera. Currently I’m in love with my Nikon F100 and it’s pairing with Portra 400. Sorry Polaroid, I’m a Nikon girl.

  • I’d love a (purely analogue) Instax Square or Wide with more control, and at a price point of max. $200ish! I like the Instax film, it is ok priced, and I am using an SQ6, which at least gives me a few controls (flash off! focus near vs standard! and I think that’s about it…), but more would be nice. I know there are some Lomo and Mint, but these are either/or expensive and some (Lomo…) seem from what I read not the most reliable… So a Fuji option would be cool…

  • I’m a bit confused how you can say that you’re not convinced that it offers anything more than the instax evo. The instax Evo is an automatic exposure camera without full shutter or aperture control

    • Yeah, I fumbled that point. What I intended was that I don’t know that it will offer anything better than the Instax Evo, specifically in the areas of image quality and versatility (that camera does offer quite a bit of control over the final printed image, and it can print images from a phone, which are highly editable). Anyway, apologies for the blundering text.

  • Very much in agreement with most of your points for sure. If Polaroid film was the old Polaroid film that I loved and miss dearly I’d splash out for this camera today, but with their frankly garbage quality film it’s a crapshoot if you’ll get anything under the best conditions and I don’t fault the camera in at least 80-90% of the problems I came across before just scrapping all my Polaroid gear. If only Instax was a little bigger in size, it would be nearly ideal. This is like buying a sports car and trying to run it on a mixture of crude oil and water. 😉

  • God I want Polaroid to work, I really do! Like you though my patience is beginning to wane. There’s only so much money I can spend on achieving zero results.

    Imperfection means that, not perfect, it doesn’t mean “incompetent”.

    This camera isn’t for me, but I HOPE the price goes some way into investment that may go into the actual valuable product. The film itself. Soon.

  • Unfortunately, this price is prohibitive for a European. Comparable to a digital camera, as you well noticed. Unfortunately, Polaroid film is still weak. I think that if the film was better, the effects would be satisfactory even on old cameras.

Leave a Reply

James Tocchio

James Tocchio is a writer and photographer, and the founder of Casual Photophile. He’s spent years researching, collecting, and shooting classic and collectible cameras. In addition to his work here, he’s also the founder of the online camera shop Fstopcameras.com.

All stories by:James Tocchio